Why These "Health Foods" Can Make You Fat
If you've spent any time looking for information about how to
lose weight, chances are you've heard of the glycemic index (GI
for short).
Despite its popularity, many people are surprised to learn that
eating more carbohydrate-rich
foods with a low GI and fewer carbohydrate-rich foods with
a high GI - without making any other change to your diet - actually
has very
little effect on weight loss.
I'll explain why in a moment. First, just in case you've never
heard of the glycemic index, here's a quick primer.
The glycemic index is used to rank different types of food
according to the effect they have on blood sugar levels.
Foods that lead to a rapid rise in blood sugar have a
high glycemic index.
Foods that lead to a slower rise in blood sugar are said
to have a low glycemic index.
While the glycemic index tells you how rapidly a food raises blood
sugar, it doesn't tell you how much carbohydrate is in that food.
To understand how the food will affect blood sugar levels, you
need to know both. That's where the glycemic load helps.
The glycemic load takes the glycemic index into account, but gives
a more complete picture than the glycemic index alone. The carbohydrate
in a carrot, for example, has a moderate glycemic index. But there
isn't a lot of it, so the glycemic load of a carrot is actually
quite low.
When I first read about the glycemic index in the early 1990's,
it seemed to make perfect sense. And, being one of those people
who have a tendency to obsess over small details, I invested a
lot of time and effort in eliminating foods with a high
GI from my diet.
Much of this effort, unfortunately, was a complete waste of time.
It's not
that there's anything wrong with following a diet that has a low
GI. However — if you make the same mistake that
I did — and focus only on the glycemic index (without making
a change to your calorie intake too), chances are you'll
end up feeling frustrated because you're not losing any weight.
In one of the most recent studies of the glycemic index, researchers
from the University of Minnesota tested whether lowering the GI
of a diet already low in calories would have any further effect
on weight loss.
The researchers compared the effects of three low-calorie diets,
each with a different glycemic load, on 29 obese adults. All of
the diets — high GI, low GI or high fat — provided
the same number of calories.
For the first 12 weeks, all food was provided to the subjects
(the feeding phase). Then, 22 subjects were told to follow
the assigned diet for an additional 24 weeks (the free-living
phase).
After 12 weeks, all three groups lost weight. However, there
was no significant difference in weight loss between the groups.
Subjects on the low GI diet lost, on average, 21.8 pounds (9.9
kilograms), while those on the high GI diet lost 20.5 pounds (9.3
kilograms).
"In summary, lowering the glycemic load and glycemic index
of weight reduction diets does not provide any added benefit
to energy restriction in promoting weight loss in obese subjects," conclude
the researchers.
Eating a diet with a low glycemic load can help with weight loss.
But, that's largely because many foods with a low glycemic index
(with the exception of high-fat foods like nuts and
avocados) also have a lower
energy density.
Most fruits and vegetables, for example,
have a low glycemic load. So, when you eat fewer foods with a high
glycemic load (e.g. cookies, cakes, or sweets) and more foods
with a low glycemic load (e.g. fruits and vegetables), you end
up eating fewer calories. The result is that you lose weight.
Maybe I'm mistaken, but I think most people realize that
eating cakes and cookies isn't going to help them lose
weight. And while some of the recipes in GI diet books are useful,
they're not always very practical.
Single people like me, for example, who are either too busy, too
lazy or too stupid to cook (I'm a little
embarrassed
to admit it wasn't until I was 31 that I discovered what "sautéing" meant)
usually want something that doesn't involve spending hours cooking
and cleaning in the kitchen .
Although its frequent appearance in newspapers and magazines
means that the glycemic index (along with companion tools such
as the
insulin index) will remain popular, it's my opinion that
it adds an unnecessary layer of complication to what is a relatively
simple (though not always easy) process.
Different foods do vary in the way they affect your metabolism
[3]. However, when it comes to losing weight, the secret to success
is still to consume fewer calories than you burn.
Although the glycemic load is useful in some circumstances, it
was never meant to be used in isolation. Peanuts and avocados,
for example, have a very low glycemic index. But, they're also
high in calories. Eat too many of them, and you'll get fat.
About The Author
Christian
Finn holds a masters degree in exercise science, is a certified
personal trainer and a regular contributor to Men's Health, Men's
Fitness and other popular fitness magazines.
If you're stuck
in a rut with your current exercise and diet plan... fed up with
only losing a pound here and there... or still skinny after months
(or even years) of trying to build muscle and gain weight... click here now for instant access to his step-by-step muscle-building and fat-burning workout routines.
|
Related Articles
References
1. Raatz, S.K., Torkelson, C.J., Redmon, J.B., Reck, K.P., Kwong, C.A., Swanson,
J.E., Liu, C., Thomas, W., & Bantle, J.P. (2005). Reduced glycemic index
and glycemic load diets do not increase the effects of energy restriction
on weight loss and insulin sensitivity in obese men and women. Journal
of Nutrition, 135, 2387-2391
2. Sheard, N.F., Clark, N.G., Brand-Miller, J.C., Franz, M.J., Pi-Sunyer,
F.X., Mayer-Davis, E., Kulkarni, K., & Geil, P. (2004). Dietary carbohydrate
(amount and type) in the prevention and management of diabetes: a statement
by the american diabetes association. Diabetes
Care, 27, 2266-2271
3. Johnston, C.S., Day, C.S., & Swan, P,D. (2002). Postprandial thermogenesis
is increased 100% on a high-protein, low-fat diet versus a high-carbohydrate,
low-fat diet in healthy, young women. Journal
of the American College of Nutrition, 21, 55-61
|