Has all this exercise been a waste of time?
If the hours you've spent at the gym this year haven't delivered
the results you wanted, the latest fitness news probably didn't
make you feel any better.
At the Australian
Health and Medical Research Congress in Sydney, obesity geneticist
Claude Bouchard reported the results of a study showing that, for
an unhappy few, even regular exercise has little benefit.
There is astounding variation in the response to exercise,"
says Bouchard. "The vast majority will benefit in some way,
but there will be a minority who will not benefit at all.
Are you one of the unhappy few? And if so, what can you do about
it?
Bouchard's comments are based on data collected from the HERITAGE
Family Study. As part of the study, 742 people from 213 families
were put through a strict 20-week exercise program [2]. Each subject
was required to exercise three times per week for an average of
42 minutes.
The team found that exercise improved maximum oxygen consumption,
a measure of aerobic fitness, by an average of 17%. Some volunteers
improved by over 40%. Others, however, showed no improvement at
all. Similar patterns were seen with cardiac output, blood pressure,
heart rate and other markers of fitness.
Bouchard reports that the impact of exercise on insulin sensitivity
a marker of risk for diabetes and heart disease also
varied. It improved in 6 out of 10 volunteers. But in the rest,
there was no change.
It's worth pointing out that subjects taking part in the study
were not given instructions about diet. The fact that insulin sensitivity
didn't change might have been because they weren't eating properly.
What's more, the workout routine used in the study wasn't a very
effective one.
The program started at 55% of VO2max (the equivalent of a brisk
walk) for 30 minutes per session, three times per week. It gradually
increased to 75% of VO2max (the equivalent of a steady run) for
50 minutes per session. It was kept at this level for the last six
weeks of training.
Subjects taking part in the 20-week trial lost, on average, less
than two pounds of fat [1]. That's about 3.5 grams of fat
per week. These results are consistent with other trials showing
that three days per week of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise
has little
effect on weight loss in the absence of a controlled diet.
A more frequent or more intense exercise program would have delivered
far better results, in terms of fat loss, aerobic fitness and other
markers of health.
Harvard researchers, for example, have found that men who exercise
at a high intensity are less likely to develop heart disease than
those following a low-intensity exercise program [6].
"More intense aerobic exercise is more effective in improving
cardiovascular fitness because it requires the heart muscle to work
harder, to pump more blood, to get more oxygen," says study
author Dr. Frank Hu, an associate professor of nutrition at Harvard
School of Public Health. "If the exercise is suitable for the
person, I think people should aim for more rigorous exercise given
the amount of energy expenditure."
In other words, if two people spend the same amount of time exercising,
the person doing the more intense exercise will benefit more.
Exercise is not a waste of time, even though there might be times
when you feel like it is.
All you can do is get the most out of your own body. There'll be
times when you see results very quickly. But there will also be
times when you feel like you're stuck on a plateau, and nothing
seems to be working. What really counts is where you end up, not
how long it takes you to get there.
Exercise is more than a way to change your body. For some, its
an excellent way to improve the way you feel.
Putting in a good workout can give you a real sense of accomplishment.
You'll become less tense. As your strength increases, so will your
confidence and independence. I believe that exercise is one of the
best ways to deal with the frustration and stress life throws at
you.
The benefits of exercise can't always be condensed into a list
of things you can test for. Remember that the things you can measure
don't always count, and what counts can't always be measured.
About The Author
Christian Finn holds a master's degree in exercise science, is a certified personal trainer and has been featured on BBC TV and radio, as well as in Men's Health, Men's Fitness, Muscle & Fitness, Fit Pro, Zest and other popular fitness magazines.
If you're stuck
in a rut with your current exercise and diet plan... fed up with
only losing a pound here and there... or still skinny after months
(or even years) of trying to build muscle and gain weight... click here now for instant access to his step-by-step muscle-building and fat-burning workout routines.
Related Articles
References
1. Wilmore, J.H., Despres, J.P., Stanforth, P.R., Mandel, S., Rice,
T., Gagnon, J., Leon, A.S., Rao, D.C., Skinner, J.S., & Bouchard,
C. (1999). Alterations in body weight and composition consequent
to 20 wk of endurance training: the HERITAGE Family Study. American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 70, 346-352
2. Bouchard, C., Leon, A.S., Rao, D.C., Skinner, J.S., Wilmore,
J.H., & Gagnon, J. (1995). The HERITAGE family study. Aims,
design, and measurement protocol. Medicine
and Science in Sports and Exercise, 27, 721-729
3. Dvorak, R.V., DeNino, W.F., Ades, P.A., & Poehlman, E.T.
(1999). Phenotypic charcteristics associated with insulin resistance
in metabolically obese but normal-weight young women. Diabetes,
48, 2210-2214
4. Poehlman, E.T., Dvorak, R.V., DeNino, W.F., Brochu, M., &
Ades, P.A. (2000). Effects of resistance training and endurance
training on insulin sensitivity in nonobese, young women: a controlled
randomized trial. Journal
of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 85, 2463-2468
5. Lee, D.D., Blair, S.N., & Jackson, A.S. (1999). Cardiorespiratory
fitness, body composition, and all-cause and cardiovascular disease
mortality in men. American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69, 373-380
6. Tanasescu, M., Leitzmann, M.F., Rimm, E.B., Willett, W.C., Stampfer,
M.J., & Hu, F.B. (2002). Exercise type and intensity in relation
to coronary heart disease in men. Journal
of the American Medical Association, 288, 1994-2000
|